Scandit vs. Dynamsoft
Comparison guide for evaluating barcode scanning SDKs, based on performance testing results from controlled tests of real barcode scanning workflow tasks.
Development teams who’ve already chosen Scandit
Scandit vs. Dynamsoft under real-world conditions
We tested Scandit and Dynamsoft with live camera scanning on a mid-range phone, the way frontline teams actually scan. Benchmarks that test decoding of static image sets don't reflect real-world challenges such as motion, distance, glare, or barcodes surrounded by other barcodes. All tests were run in July 2026.
1.4x
Scandit scanned barcodes from a median of 1.4x further away than Dynamsoft
2.3x
Scandit delivered 2.3x higher scan accuracy for grocery shelf labels than Dynamsoft
83%
Scandit matched or beat Dynamsoft in 83% of tough code conditions
1.6x
Scandit was 1.6x faster than Dynamsoft in fashion receiving tests
Scandit vs. Dynamsoft under real-world conditions
We tested Scandit and Dynamsoft with live camera scanning on a mid-range phone, the way frontline teams actually scan. Benchmarks that test decoding of static image sets don't reflect real-world challenges such as motion, distance, glare, or barcodes surrounded by other barcodes. All tests were run in July 2026.
1.4X
Scandit scanned barcodes from a median of 1.4X further away than Dynamsoft
2.3X
Scandit delivered 2.3X higher scan accuracy for grocery shelf labels than Dynamsoft
83%
Scandit matched or beat Dynamsoft in 83% of tough code conditions
1.6X
Scandit was 1.6X faster than Dynamsoft in fashion receiving tests
:format(webp))
Scandit scanned barcodes from a median of 1.4X further away
Why this matters: Users don’t waste time moving closer to the barcodes they need to scan, and there is less need for ladders or crouching down.
- Scandit could scan from further away than Dynamsoft for every barcode type tested, with a median of 1.4X further away across the 7 measured barcode types.
- Results ranged from an average of 1.14X further away for EAN13 to 3.6X further away for Codabar.
- Test devices were mounted to a sliding test harness that moved incrementally closer to the barcode until it could be scanned, over 5 test runs. Environmental light was constant, and barcodes were calibrated to specific mil-sizes.
:format(webp))
Scandit scanned ESLs from up to 2.7X further away
Why this matters: Electronic shelf labels (ESLs) are particularly challenging to scan due to the small size of barcodes, additional glare, and acute angles. A longer scan range improves usability as retail associates do not have to repeatedly bend down, reach up awkwardly, or spend time repositioning themselves.
- We tested the distance from which a human using Scandit and Dynamsoft could scan ESLs on top, middle, and bottom retail shelves.
- For ESLs with regular barcodes, Scandit scanned from 1.5X further away for top and middle shelves, and 2.7X further away for bottom shelves.
:format(webp))
Scandit delivered 2.3X higher scan accuracy for grocery shelf labels
Why this matters: In the real world, the barcode users want to scan is typically surrounded by other barcodes. Unintended scans interrupt workflows and lead to costly and time-consuming error correction further down the line if they go unnoticed.
- The user attempted to scan 7 ESL labels showing EAN-13/UPC-A barcodes, positioned on a standard shelf rail. To simulate a real-world retail environment, products were also placed on the shelf above with their barcodes visible.
- Scandit scanned the correct label every time and the workflow was completed in an average of 7 seconds. Dynamsoft captured an average of 9 unintended scans (i.e. belonging to another product) per test run. As a result of this, the workflow was completed in an average of 31 seconds.
- Labels scanned sequentially over 5 test runs.
:format(webp))
Scandit matched or beat Dynamsoft in 83% of tough code conditions
Why this matters: Barcodes are scanned under imperfect conditions in the real world, e.g. damage, glare, occlusion. Scanning difficulties reduce efficiency, and false positives result in bad data entering your systems.
- We measured the true positive rate for difficult-to-scan codes using a test sheet covering 13 common scenarios and EAN-13 and Code 128 barcodes.
- Scandit beat or matched Dynamsoft in 83% (19 out of 23) tough code conditions.
:format(webp))
Scandit was 1.6X faster in fashion receiving tests
Why this matters: Faster receiving frees up labor time for other tasks.
- It took a user an average of 26 seconds to scan 10 plastic-wrapped shirts using Scandit, compared to 40 seconds using Dynamsoft.
- This means that in 1 minute, Scandit would scan an average of 23 items and Dynamsoft would scan an average of 15 items.
- Products were scanned sequentially over 5 test runs.
The scanning layer for every app
More than 170m active mobile devices. 9 of the top 15 global brands trust Scandit, alongside SMBs around the globe.
Security and privacy first
All image processing performed on-device by default. Customers retain complete control over data collection and processing. ISO27001 certified.
Pricing built for 5 devices or 5 million
Pricing that works for businesses of all sizes. Fixed and usage-based options, with editions (plans) for different barcode scanning needs.
Support you can count on
A partnership approach that goes far beyond a support ticket. We’ll guide you through evaluation, integration, and rollout to everyday operations.
Not just logos, results
:format(webp))
The Scandit context-aware AI engine helps eliminate unintentional scans, a result of the environments Yuka users usually scan products in ... where barcodes are heavily prevalent.
François Martin, CTO and co-founder | 200-person consumer health start-up
80 million
global users
8.3 billion
scans to date
:format(webp))
Two issues were important to us ... guaranteeing high performance across multiple types of barcode ... [and] how well the product would be supported. Scandit outperformed alternative open-source and plug-in solutions on both fronts.
Stefan Graf, Product Owner | 37,000-person national railway
:format(webp))
The ability to batch scan from Scandit MatrixScan Count was huge. I did a demo of the solution before we launched and I had boxes set up vertically, some horizontal, some at an angle, and you could still just take your phone and it just picked everything up.
Stephen Prichard, Manager of Application Development | 1,600-person medical device manufacturer
5 min
to first scan in warehouse
:format(webp))
I was blown away by the speed and accuracy, we also saw examples of barcodes that were worn or damaged where regular scanning couldn’t capture them, but Scandit could.
Doug Anteau, Director of Logistics and Warehouse Operations | 500-person enterprise mobility specialist
50%
faster processing times
30-40%
total cost savings
:format(webp))
Don't underestimate how much the quality of your scanning technology shapes everything downstream.
Yixin Zhu, VP of Engineering | 200-person consumer grocery start-up
33%
increase in number of items posted to the platform each week
More barcode scanning resources
How to Measure Barcode Scanning Performance
Learn how to test barcode scanning performance with proven metrics, real-world test cases, and best practices.
How to Choose the Best Barcode Scanner SDK
Technical comparisons to perform when choosing the best barcode scanner SDK. Performance, developer support, security, licensing, and more.
Best Barcode Scanner Hardware: Compare Options
Compare the best barcode scanners for every budget. Discover the right device for speed, accuracy, and your scanning environment.
Frequently asked questions
Try Scandit for freeTest the Scandit SDK today
Sign up for a free 30-day trial to stress-test Scandit in your stack today.